The Bible, often viewed as a collection of ancient moral codes, contains profound psychological and metaphysical truths. For those familiar with the teachings of Neville Goddard, these scriptures become something far greater—a map to understanding consciousness and the nature of creation. Through Goddard's perspective, we can unlock layers of meaning, not just in the narrative, but in the consciousness behind it.
In this post, we’ll explore a seemingly stark and restrictive passage from Leviticus concerning incestuous relationships, specifically the prohibition of “lying with your father or mother.” Through Goddard’s principle that “Imagination creates reality,” we'll delve into how these biblical rules serve as metaphors for the workings of our own consciousness. We’ll also expand our exploration to include the concept of in-laws, and how they fit into the deeper, symbolic meaning. Finally, we’ll discuss how Leviticus' legalistic approach contrasts with the more direct path to manifestation that Goddard teaches—found in the “state of Jesus.”
Leviticus: Literal Laws and Metaphysical Truths
Leviticus, especially Chapter 18, presents a series of laws that prohibit sexual relations with close relatives. The text reads:
Leviticus 18:6
“None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord.”
Leviticus 18:7
“You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father, or the nakedness of your mother. She is your mother; you shall not uncover her nakedness.”
Leviticus 18:8
“You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife; it is your father’s nakedness.”
Leviticus 18:9
“You shall not uncover the nakedness of your sister, your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether born at home or abroad.”
At first glance, these are clear prohibitions set within a cultural and religious context. However, when viewed through Neville Goddard’s lens, these laws take on a deeper, psychological meaning, shedding light on the workings of the inner consciousness and our capacity for manifestation.
The legalistic nature of Leviticus can be seen as an early, less direct attempt at shaping consciousness through external rules. These prohibitions—while seemingly restrictive—may have been intended to create mental and emotional boundaries, helping individuals gain awareness of their internal state. Leviticus set forth these laws as a way to manage behaviour and guide inner consciousness, directing individuals to recognise and avoid patterns that hinder spiritual and emotional growth. It offers an external structure that tries to influence inner states and create discipline—but it doesn’t go deep enough to directly change the core of one’s consciousness.
In contrast, Goddard's teachings offer a more refined and direct approach to manifestation. Where Leviticus uses external laws to shape the outer behaviour, the “state of Jesus”—as taught by Goddard—demands that we transform from the inside out, by consciously embodying the feeling of the wish fulfilled.
From Legal Boundaries to Christ Consciousness
Leviticus can be viewed as an attempt to influence inner states through external rules—rules that set boundaries and guide actions. While these rules were valuable in shaping societal behaviour, they fall short of directly affecting the inner state. The “state of Jesus”, however, is a powerful shift in consciousness. It represents the embodiment of divine wholeness, the I AM that transcends limitations, and the assumption of the desired reality without struggle or effort.
In Goddard’s teachings, Jesus is the model of the individual who has fully realised their divine creative power. Jesus didn’t rely on external rules or boundaries to shape his reality. Instead, he assumed his reality—he lived in the state of the wish fulfilled, knowing that his thoughts, feelings, and assumptions were the creative force behind everything.
Where Leviticus uses external laws to regulate behaviour and control desires, Goddard teaches that true manifestation comes when we move beyond external boundaries and align with the inner state of divine wholeness. Through the power of assumption, we create our desired reality by embodying the feeling that it already exists. This is a much more direct and effective approach to manifestation, one that doesn't rely on the limitations of external rules but instead invites us to create from the inside.
The Inner “Family” and the Power of Assumption: The State of Nakedness After the Fall
In Goddard's framework, the story of Adam and Eve is a psychological allegory. Their fall from grace and subsequent nakedness represent a shift from a state of unified, effortless creation to an awareness of separation and lack. Adam and Eve's nakedness symbolises the loss of their innate, divinely empowered state, and their newfound vulnerability and need.
In the same way, Leviticus’ prohibition of “uncovering nakedness” can be interpreted as a metaphor for reliving this post-fall state of lack within our consciousness. It symbolises the patterns of limitation, separation, and unfulfilled desires that we create within our minds.
Goddard teaches that the “nakedness” described in Leviticus refers to a state of vulnerability, a state where we focus on the lack within ourselves, rather than the divine wholeness we can embody. Through this lens, let’s explore the symbolic meanings of different “relatives” mentioned in Leviticus, showing how they relate to our inner consciousness:
Close Relatives: Dwelling in Ingrained Patterns of Lack
The "close relatives" represent deeply ingrained mental patterns, assumptions, and beliefs. "Uncovering their nakedness" can symbolise dwelling in these habitual thoughts—thoughts that reflect a perceived lack or limitation within us. This mirrors Adam and Eve’s newfound awareness of their vulnerability after the fall.
Father: Identifying with a Limited Awareness of Being
The "Father" represents our core sense of I AM, our awareness of being. To "uncover his nakedness" could symbolise identifying with a limited or fragmented awareness of ourselves, much like Adam’s sense of separation from his divine source after the fall.
Mother: Accepting a Barren or Unproductive Subconscious
The "Mother" in Goddard's framework represents the subconscious mind, the fertile ground where creation takes place. "Uncovering her nakedness" suggests accepting a belief that our subconscious is barren or incapable of manifesting our desires, reflecting the post-fall struggle for fulfilment and abundance.
Father's Wife (In-Law to the I AM): Embracing Beliefs Rooted in Separation and Lack
The "father’s wife" could represent beliefs adopted from external sources, beliefs that are not rooted in the divine self (the I AM) but in the dualistic view of the world. "Uncovering her nakedness" means internalising these beliefs of lack and separation, further reinforcing the fragmented state of consciousness after the fall.
Sister: Focusing on the Lack of Wholeness Within Different Aspects of Self
The "Sister" symbolises the various aspects of our own consciousness. "Uncovering her nakedness" represents focusing on perceived lack or incomplete parts of ourselves, reinforcing the sense of internal fragmentation that arises from the fall.
Beyond Law: The State of Jesus—Reclaiming Divine Wholeness
While Leviticus focuses on external laws and regulations, Goddard points us towards a more direct method of manifestation: the state of Jesus. This is a state of complete faith, wholeness, and divine empowerment. Jesus' life embodied the divine wholeness that existed before the fall, where the individual had complete control over their reality through the assumption of the wish fulfilled.
Rather than attempting to control our behaviour through external laws, the state of Jesus invites us to embody divine consciousness and manifest from a place of complete alignment with our true nature. It is in this state that manifestation becomes effortless, as we fully accept that our desires are already fulfilled.
Cultivating a Harmonious Inner World Through Assumption
When viewed through Goddard's teachings, the legalistic structure of Leviticus represents an early attempt at managing consciousness by using external rules. However, the true power of manifestation lies in internal transformation—in assuming the state of divine wholeness that aligns us with the creative power of the universe.
By choosing to embody the state of divine wholeness and rejecting beliefs that reinforce limitation, we can move beyond the need for external rules and take control of our reality. We manifest from a place of complete alignment with our desires, just as Jesus did, creating effortlessly from a state of wholeness and faith.
Conclusion
The story of Adam and Eve, when interpreted through Neville Goddard’s teachings, serves as a guide to understanding how we manifest reality. The true “uncovering of nakedness” lies not in physical relations, but in the awareness of lack and separation that we hold within our consciousness. The path to successful manifestation does not lie in following external laws but in embodying the state of divine wholeness—the “state of Jesus.” By consciously choosing the thoughts and assumptions we live by, we take command of our creative power and manifest a reality that reflects our true, divine potential.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment! Comments are reviewed before publishing.